A Structural Approach to Market Definition with an Application to the Hospital Industry
68 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2011 Last revised: 7 Jul 2023
Date Written: January 2011
Abstract
Market definition is essential to merger analysis. Because no standard approach to market definition exists, opposing parties in antitrust cases often disagree about the extent of the market. These differences have been particularly relevant in the hospital industry, where the courts have denied seven of eight merger challenges since 1994, due largely to disagreements over geographic market definition. We compare geographic markets produced using common ad hoc methodologies to a method that directly applies the "SSNIP test" to hospitals in California using a structural model. Our results suggest that previously employed methods overstate hospital demand elasticities by a factor of 2.4 to 3.4 and define larger markets than would be implied by the merger guidelines's hypothetical monopolist test. The use of these methods in differentiated product industries may lead to mistaken geographic market delineation, and was likely a contributing factor to the permissive legal environment for hospital mergers.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Competition in Health Care Markets
By Martin Gaynor and Robert J. Town
-
Antitrust and Competition in Health Care Markets
By Martin Gaynor and William B. Vogt
-
Antitrust and Competition in Health Care Markets
By Martin Gaynor and William B. Vogt
-
Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets
By Martin Gaynor and Deborah Haas-wilson
-
Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets
By Martin Gaynor and Deborah Haas-wilson
-
Are Invisible Hands Good Hands? Moral Hazard, Competition, and the 2nd Best in Health Care Markets
By Martin Gaynor, Deborah Haas-wilson, ...
-
By Martin Gaynor, Deborah Haas-wilson, ...
-
By Martin Gaynor and William B. Vogt
-
By Martin Gaynor and William B. Vogt