Voting by Ballots and Feet in the Laboratory
University of Siena Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory Working Paper No. 36/2011
25 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2011
Date Written: January 15, 2011
Abstract
This paper provides laboratory evidence on the efficiency-enhancing properties of the Tiebout model as a decentralized system of public goods provision. Tiebout (1956) shows that if a sufficient number of local communities exist to accommodate different types of preferences, individuals sort themselves in a way that provides an efficient allocation of public goods and taxes. Our experiment aims to disentangle the effect of voting participation and is composed of two treatments. In the non-participation treatment, local public good provision is chosen by only one subject, while the other members of the community can only stay in or moves to another community. In the participation treatment, all the community members have the right to vote as well as to move to another community and collective decisions are taken by majority rule. Our findings show that social welfare is greater in the participation than in the non-participation treatment. We conclude that voting with one's feet increases efficiency if all the community members vote and that the influence of voting participation on the allocation of local public goods should be taken into account to assess the viability of the Tiebout model.
Keywords: Tiebout Model, Local Public Goods, Voting Participation, Federalism, Experiment
JEL Classification: C91, H41, C92, D23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Economic Approach to Social Capital
By Edward L. Glaeser, David Laibson, ...
-
The Economic Approach to Social Capital
By Edward L. Glaeser, David Laibson, ...