Tort Law and Happiness

Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 36, p. 1, 2010

30 Pages Posted: 19 Jan 2011

Date Written: January 18, 2011

Abstract

Tort law awards so-called Hedonic Damages to compensate Plaintiff for any loss of enjoyment of life caused by Defendant’s negligence. Some have argued that Hedonic Damages should be eliminated, based on important surprising data on happiness emerging from experimental psychology research. This Happiness Data shows that people who have suffered even very serious injuries become less happy only temporarily and return to pre-injury levels of happiness after a brief adjustment period. Thus, goes the argument, the Happiness Data illustrates the lack of a normative basis for Hedonic Damages. I argue against this view. Damages in tort law are grounded in the reasons for which defendant’s behaviour is thought to be unreasonable: in Justice Cardozo’s famous words, ‘the risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed.’ Plaintiff’s enjoyment of life is one of these reasons and thus should be protected with damages. Drawing on an example of Ernest Weinrib’s I show that Hedonic Damages, like all damages, are best thought of not in terms of all things-considered assessments of advantages and disadvantages, but in terms of Plaintiff’s right to have Defendant take due care with respect to her safety. Thus postaccident rebounds in happiness do not affect Defendant’s liability.

Keywords: tort, tort theory, happiness

Suggested Citation

Essert, Christopher, Tort Law and Happiness (January 18, 2011). Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 36, p. 1, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1743167

Christopher Essert (Contact Author)

Queen's University Faculty of Law ( email )

Macdonald Hall
Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6 K7L3N6
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
239
Abstract Views
1,421
Rank
232,572
PlumX Metrics