The Gambler’s Fallacy and Gender
CentER Discussion Paper No. 2011-011
21 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2011
Date Written: January 25, 2011
Abstract
The “gambler’s fallacy” is the false belief that a random event is less likely to occur if the event has occurred recently. Such beliefs are false if the onset of events is in fact independent of previous events. We study gender differences in the gambler’s fallacy using data from the Danish state lottery. Our data set is unique in that we track individual players over time which allows us to investigate how men and women react with their number picking to outcomes of recent lotto drawings. We find evidence of gambler’s fallacy for men but not for women. On average, men are about 1% less likely to bet on numbers drawn in the previous week than on numbers not drawn. Women do not react significantly to the previous week’s drawing outcome.
Keywords: Lottery Gambling, Gender, Gambler's Fallacy
JEL Classification: D03, D81, D84, J16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Predicting the Next Step of a Random Walk: Experimental Evidence of Regime-Shifting Beliefs
-
The Gambler's and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and Applications
By Matthew Rabin and Dimitri Vayanos
-
The Gambler's and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and Applications
By Matthew Rabin and Dimitri Vayanos
-
By Robert J. Bloomfield, Robert Libby, ...
-
The Market Impact of Trends and Sequences in Performance: New Evidence
By Greg R. Durham, J. Spencer Martin, ...
-
Do Sophisticated Investors Believe in the Law of Small Numbers?
By Guillermo Baquero and Marno Verbeek
-
Do Sophisticated Investors Believe in the Law of Small Numbers?
By Guillermo Baquero and Marno Verbeek
-
Behavioral Biases and Investor Behavior: Predicting the Next Step of a Random Walk (Revisited)
By Elena N. Asparouhova, Michael L. Lemmon, ...