Revenue Management with Lifetime Value Considerations: Balancing Customer Acquisition and Retention Spending for Firms with Limited Capacity

Forthcoming in Management Science

Posted: 1 Mar 2011 Last revised: 2 Nov 2013

See all articles by Anton Ovchinnikov

Anton Ovchinnikov

Smith School of Business - Queen's University; INSEAD - Decision Sciences

Béatrice Boulu-Reshef

Université d'Orléans

Phillip E. Pfeifer

University of Virginia - Darden School of Business

Date Written: September 9, 2013

Abstract

This paper discusses the interaction between revenue management (RM) and customer relationship management (CRM) for a firm that operates in a customer retention situation but faces limited capacity. We present a dynamic programming model for how the firm balances investments in customer acquisition and retention, as well as retention across multiple customer types. We characterize the optimal policy and discuss how the policy changes depending on capacity limitations. We then contrast the modeling results with those of a behavioral experiment in which subjects acted as managers making acquisition and retention decisions.

In the modeling part of the paper we introduce a new concept, the value of an incremental customer (VIC), and show that regardless of capacity limitation the firm selects acquisition and retention spending such that the cost of acquiring/retaining a customer equals his/her VIC. When capacity is unlimited VIC equals customer lifetime value (CLV), but when capacity is limited it is much smaller and changes dynamically depending on the number of customers and their mix. As a result the optimal spending is constant and depends on CLV for the firms with unlimited capacity, but changes dynamically and is generally unrelated to CLV when capacity is limited.

In the experimental part we introduce a concept of conditional optimality and discuss its applicability to the analysis of state-dependent decisions. Applying this concept to our data we document a number of decision biases, specifically the subjects' tendency to overspend on retaining high-value customers and underspend on lower-value customers retention and acquisition. Understanding these biases and the optimal policy can help firms better manage their revenues and customer relationships.

Keywords: Revenue Management, RM, Customer Relationships Management, CRM, Dynamic Pricing, Dynamic Programming, Behavioral Operations, Acquisition, Retention, Spending, Balance, Limited, Capacity, Customer, Lifetime, Value, CLV

Suggested Citation

Ovchinnikov, Anton and Boulu-Reshef, Béatrice and Pfeifer, Phillip E., Revenue Management with Lifetime Value Considerations: Balancing Customer Acquisition and Retention Spending for Firms with Limited Capacity (September 9, 2013). Forthcoming in Management Science, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1763804 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1763804

Anton Ovchinnikov (Contact Author)

Smith School of Business - Queen's University ( email )

143 Union Str. West
Kingston, ON K7L3N6
Canada

INSEAD - Decision Sciences ( email )

United States

Béatrice Boulu-Reshef

Université d'Orléans ( email )

Rue de Blois
Orléans, 45000
France

HOME PAGE: http://www.beatrice-boulu-reshef.info/

Phillip E. Pfeifer

University of Virginia - Darden School of Business ( email )

P.O. Box 6550
Charlottesville, VA 22906-6550
United States
434-924-4803 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.darden.virginia.edu/faculty/Pfeifer.htm

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
2,262
PlumX Metrics