Multiple Oligarchy: Aristotle and Contemporary Elite Politics

31 Pages Posted: 22 Feb 2011 Last revised: 11 Apr 2011

Date Written: April 8, 2011

Abstract

Contemporary social science and participatory theory has raised the question of whether representative government in large-scale modern states constitutes an oligarchy. Using Aristotle’s insight that oligarchy is not a single regime but a spectrum of forms of elite rule, this essay inquires into the precise character of this regime to make sense of the possible roles of participatory politics. First, I introduce Aristotle’s theory of oligarchy as a spectrum of regimes ranging from institutions that broadly favor the wealthy, to hereditary and dynastic rule. Second, using Aristotle’s framework and his account of hairesis (election or choice), I recast representative government as a regime in constant danger of degenerating toward an extreme form of elite rule that bears critical similarities to Aristotle’s hereditary oligarchy. Third, I use Aristotle’s framework to assess contemporary representative government. Finally, I argue that participatory reforms take on a new urgency once the nature of contemporary oligarchy is fully understood.

Keywords: democracy, oligarchy, Aristotle, representative government

Suggested Citation

Barker, Derek W. M., Multiple Oligarchy: Aristotle and Contemporary Elite Politics (April 8, 2011). Western Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting Paper , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1767068

Derek W. M. Barker (Contact Author)

Kettering Foundation ( email )

200 Commons Road
Dayton, OH 45459
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
162
Abstract Views
932
Rank
331,086
PlumX Metrics