Economics of the Independent Invention Defense Under Incomplete Information
25 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2011 Last revised: 3 Jan 2015
Date Written: February 19, 2011
Abstract
Patents lead to ex-post dead-weight losses arising from a non-competitive market structure for the invention. Many have argued that introducing independent invention as a defense (IID) to patent infringement can increase social welfare by decreasing such dead-weight losses at the price of a modest decrease in the number of inventions. This paper considers the effects of IID in a setting where R&D firms have incomplete information about their rivals. Four main results follow under incomplete information: (i) Fewer things are invented under an IID regime, (ii) IIDs effects on welfare are ambiguous, (iii) IID is more likely to increase welfare if gains from competition in the product market are high, and (iv) determining precise conditions under which IID performs better than the current regime requires access to data which is extremely hard to find and quantify.
Keywords: Patents, Independent Invention, Incomplete Information
JEL Classification: H0, K0, L0, L5, O3, O31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law
-
Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law
-
Patent Reform: Aligning Reward and Contribution
By Carl Shapiro
-
Scarcity of Ideas and R&D Options: Use it, Lose it or Bank it
By Nisvan Erkal and Suzanne Scotchmer
-
The Decision to Patent, Cumulative Innovation, and Optimal Policy
By Nisvan Erkal
-
Scarcity of Ideas and R&D Options: Use It, Lose It, or Bank It
By Nisvan Erkal and Suzanne Scotchmer