Institutional Enforcement, Labor-Market Rigidities, and Economic Performance
25 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011
Date Written: October 2006
Abstract
This paperstudy the issue of institutional enforcement of regulations by focusing on labor-market policies and their potential link to economic performance. It test the different impacts of enforceable and non-enforceable labor regulations by proxying non-enforceable labor rigidity measures using data on conventions from the International Labor Organization (ILO). It has been argued that non-enforceable conventions -that is, those that exist on paper and are simply de jure regulations -appear to be more distortionary and tend to be the least enforced in practice (Squire and Suthiwart-Narueput, 1997). According to Freeman (1993), these conventions reflect the ideal regulatory framework from an institutionalist perspective and cover a variety of labor market issues, from child labor to placement agencies. Whereas in theory, a country`s ratification of ILO conventions gives the country legal status and thus supersedes domestic regulations relating to those issues, in practice the degree of labor-market rigidity depends on how the conventions are enforced. It is the outcome of the regulations that matters, rather than their number.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
By Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta, ...
-
By Simeon Djankov, Florencio Lopez-de-silanes, ...
-
By Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta, ...
-
The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand
By Timothy Frye and Andrei Shleifer
-
By Juan Carlos Botero, Simeon Djankov, ...
-
By Juan Carlos Botero, Simeon Djankov, ...
-
Governance Matters Iii: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002
By Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, ...