How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program
55 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2011 Last revised: 22 May 2023
Date Written: April 2011
Abstract
Governments often contract with private firms to provide public services such as health care and education. To decrease firms' incentives to selectively enroll low-cost individuals, governments frequently "risk-adjust" payments to firms based on enrollees' characteristics. We model how risk adjustment affects selection and differential payments---the government's payments to a firm for covering an individual minus the counterfactual cost had the government directly covered her. We show that firms reduce selection along dimensions included in the risk-adjustment formula, while increasing selection along excluded dimensions. These responses can actually increase differential payments relative to pre-risk-adjustment levels and thus risk adjustment can raise the total cost to the government of providing the public service. We confirm both selection predictions using individual-level data from Medicare, which in 2004 began risk-adjusting payments to private Medicare Advantage plans. We find that differential payments actually rise after risk adjustment and estimate that they totaled $30 billion in 2006, or nearly eight percent of total Medicare spending.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Hmos and Fee-for-Service Health Care Expenditures: Evidence from Medicare
-
By Tom Getzen
-
The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from the Introduction of Medicare
-
What Did Medicare Do (and Was it Worth it)?
By Amy Finkelstein and Robin Mcknight
-
Managed Care and Health Care Expenditures: Evidence from Medicare
-
The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization
By Mark Duggan and Fiona M. Scott Morton
-
Does Contracting Out Increase the Efficiency of Government Programs? Evidence from Medicaid Hmos
By Mark Duggan
-
Do Investors Forecast Fat Firms? Evidence from the Gold Mining Industry
By Severin Borenstein and Joseph Farrell
-
Hospitals, Managed Care, and the Charity Caseload in California
By Janet Currie and John Fahr