Do You Have a Voting Plan? Implementation Intentions, Voter Turnout, and Organic Plan Making

Posted: 12 May 2011

See all articles by David Nickerson

David Nickerson

University of Notre Dame

Todd Rogers

Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)

Date Written: May 10, 2011

Abstract

Phone calls encouraging citizens to vote are staples of modern campaigns. Insights from psychological science can make these calls dramatically more potent while also generating opportunities to expand psychological theory. We present a field experiment conducted during the 2008 presidential election (N = 287,228) showing that facilitating the formation of a voting plan (i.e., implementation intentions) can increase turnout by 4.1 percentage points among those contacted, but a standard encouragement call and self-prediction have no significant impact. Among single- eligible-voter households, the formation of a voting plan increased turnout among persons contacted by 9.1 percentage points, whereas those in multiple-eligible voter households were unaffected by all scripts. Some situational factors may organically facilitate implementation-intentions formation more readily than others; we present data suggesting that this could explain the differential treatment effect that we found. We discuss implications for psychological and political science, and public interventions involving implementation intentions formation.

Keywords: implementation intentions, self-prediction, voting, nudges

Suggested Citation

Nickerson, David and Rogers, Todd, Do You Have a Voting Plan? Implementation Intentions, Voter Turnout, and Organic Plan Making (May 10, 2011). Psychological Science, Vol. 21, pp. 194-199, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1837802

David Nickerson

University of Notre Dame ( email )

361 Mendoza College of Business
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5646
United States

Todd Rogers (Contact Author)

Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) ( email )

79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
711
PlumX Metrics