Is Gifted Education a Bright Idea? Assessing the Impact of Gifted and Talented Programs on Achievement
53 Pages Posted: 31 May 2011 Last revised: 13 Mar 2022
Date Written: May 2011
Abstract
In this paper we determine how the receipt of gifted and talented (GT) services affects student outcomes. We identify the causal relationship by exploiting a discontinuity in eligibility requirements and find that for students on the margin there is no discernable impact on achievement even though peers improve substantially. We then use randomized lotteries to examine the impact of attending a GT magnet program relative to GT programs in other schools and find that, despite being exposed to higher quality teachers and peers that are one standard deviation higher achieving, only science achievement improves. We argue that these results are consistent with an invidious comparison model of peer effects offsetting other benefits. Evidence of large reductions in course grades and rank relative to peers in both regression discontinuity and lottery models are consistent with this explanation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Eric A. Hanushek and Ludger Woessmann
-
By Ludger Woessmann and Eric A. Hanushek
-
By Eric A. Hanushek and Ludger Woessmann
-
By Esther Duflo, Pascaline Dupas, ...
-
Peer Effects and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya
By Esther Duflo, Pascaline Dupas, ...
-
Ability Tracking, School Competition, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits
By Dennis Epple, Elizabeth Newlon, ...
-
School Choice and the Distributional Effects of Ability Tracking: Does Separation Increase Equality?
By David N. Figlio and Marianne Page
-
Comprehensive Versus Selective Schooling in England in Wales: What Do We Know?
By Jörn-steffen Pischke and Alan Manning