Complex Economics and Patent Remedies

IP Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 50-55, 2011

U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 210

7 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2011 Last revised: 3 Jan 2015

See all articles by John M. Golden

John M. Golden

University of Texas at Austin - School of Law

Date Written: May 1, 2011

Abstract

Robert Merges and Richard Nelson’s 1990 article On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope focuses attention on patent rights’ capacity to slow innovative progress by “taxing” or otherwise impeding the activities of follow-on innovators. They argue that such dynamic “drag” from patent rights can be especially problematic with respect to “cumulative technologies,” which might be crudely described as technologies in which significant advances tend to involve a multiplicity of substantially novel features. Broad patent scope can decelerate the development of such a technology by “reducing competition in the market for improvements to the patented technology.” The result can be a relatively “sluggish” rate of further technological advance. This short essay considers what Merges and Nelson's article about patent scope suggests in relation to modern debates over patent remedies.

Keywords: complex economics

Suggested Citation

Golden, John M., Complex Economics and Patent Remedies (May 1, 2011). IP Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 50-55, 2011, U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 210, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1865338

John M. Golden (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )

School of Law
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
(512) 232-1469 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
143
Abstract Views
1,293
Rank
366,674
PlumX Metrics