Income, Democracy, and the Cunning of Reason

41 Pages Posted: 20 Jun 2011 Last revised: 24 Apr 2023

See all articles by Daniel Treisman

Daniel Treisman

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Political Science

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 2011

Abstract

A long-standing debate pits those who think economic development leads to democratization against those who argue that both result from distant historical causes. Using the most comprehensive estimates of national income available, I show that development is associated with more democratic government--but in the medium run (10 to 20 years). The reason is that, for the most part, higher income only prompts a breakthrough to more democratic politics after the incumbent leader falls from power. And in the short run, faster economic growth increases the leader's odds of survival. This logic--for which I provide evidence at the levels of individual countries and the world--helps explain why democracy advances in waves followed by periods of stasis and why dictators, concerned only to entrench themselves in power, end up preparing their countries to leap to a higher level of democracy when they are eventually overthrown.

Suggested Citation

Treisman, Daniel, Income, Democracy, and the Cunning of Reason (June 2011). NBER Working Paper No. w17132, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1866091

Daniel Treisman (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Political Science ( email )

405 Hilgard Ave.
3265 Bunche Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472
United States
650-725-8556 (Phone)
650-723-1687 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
600
Rank
441,967
PlumX Metrics