A Quantitative Risk-Based Approach to the Transparency on Non-Equity Investment Products
Quaderni di Finanza, CONSOB, 2009
66 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2011
Date Written: May 4, 2009
Abstract
The purpose of the transparency on the risk profile of non-equity investment products is to allow investors to take informed investment decisions. In an international framework characterized by an increasing globalization of markets and a growing integration of banking, asset management and insurance activities, the traditional use of narrative descriptions of the various risks is no longer effective. On the contrary, it would be better to use synthetic indicators which are immediately comprehensible to investors and defined in relation to robust and objective quantitative metrics. The result is a risk-based approach to transparency built on three pillars: the recommended investment time horizon, that is the investment horizon which is compatible with the investor's liquidity preferences, the potential returns that the non-equity investment product can offer to the investor, and the degree of risk associated with that product.
The information obtained from these three pillars allows to determine the essential elements of the financial investment, both for the purposes of the disclosure to be provided in offering prospectuses, and for the suitability tests performed by distributors.
To ensure a concrete implementation of the risk-based approach to transparency, the current fragmentation of the EU regulatory framework should be overcome through the issuing of a single directive on the transparency of non-equity investment products able to concretely realize the levelling the playing field principle. In this perspective, the Italian law-maker could intervene to align the transparency requirements of class I policies to those of the financial-insurance products already under the Consob supervision.
Keywords: Transparency, risk, return, investment time horizon, unbundling, risk-free asset, benchmark, prospectus, product information sheet, volatility, GARCH, probability scenarios, key information document, first passage times, pricing, fair value, mark-up, mispricing, risk-neutral measure, migration
JEL Classification: C02, C32, C51, C61, G11, G17, G20, G32, G38, K23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Regulation Fd and the Financial Information Environment
By Frank Heflin, K.r. Subramanyam, ...
-
Regulation Fair Disclosure and Earnings Information: Market, Analyst, and Corporate Responses
By Warren Bailey, Haitao Li, ...
-
Informational Effects of Regulation Fd: Evidence from Rating Agencies
By Philippe Jorion, Alfred Z. Liu, ...
-
The Effectiveness of Regulation Fd
By Andreas Gintschel and Stanimir Markov
-
By Anup Agrawal, Mark A. Chen, ...
-
The Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure: Trading Costs and Information Asymmetry
By Kumar Venkataraman, Rex Thompson, ...
-
Managerial and Investor Responses to Disclosure Regulation: The Case of Reg Fd and Conference Calls
By Brian J. Bushee, Dawn A. Matsumoto, ...
-
Managerial and Investor Responses to Disclosure Regulation: The Case of Reg Fd and Conference Calls
By Brian J. Bushee, Dawn A. Matsumoto, ...
-
Getting Up to Speed on the Financial Crisis: a One-Weekend-Reader's Guide
By Gary B. Gorton and Andrew Metrick