The Limits on Legislative Power to Withhold Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 99, p. 316, June 2011

2 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2011

See all articles by Jeffrey A. Parness

Jeffrey A. Parness

Northern Illinois University - College of Law

Date Written: June 13, 2011

Abstract

Confusion abounds over the term “jurisdiction” in Illinois trial courts. When issues involve only subject matter jurisdiction, that is, issues implicating the trial court’s power “to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceeding in question belongs,” Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 199 Ill.2d 325, 334 (2002), there is still confusion. Troubles surface, in part, because the Illinois constitutional landscape changed in 1964. Pre-1964 precedents are still occasionally employed in Illinois circuit courts. Troubles also arise because legislatures generally utilize varied meanings for the term “jurisdiction.” The Illinois Supreme Court, in In Re Luis R., 239 Ill.2d 295 (2010), sought to eliminate much of the confusion. Hopefully, confusion will continue to recede, as it has since Belleville.

Keywords: subject matter jurisdiction, justiciable matters, justiciabilty, trial courts, cases or controversies

Suggested Citation

Parness, Jeffrey A., The Limits on Legislative Power to Withhold Subject Matter Jurisdiction (June 13, 2011). Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 99, p. 316, June 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1884944

Jeffrey A. Parness (Contact Author)

Northern Illinois University - College of Law ( email )

Swen Parson Hall
DeKalb, IL 60115
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
1,111
Rank
679,087
PlumX Metrics