Inefficiencies from Metropolitan Political and Fiscal Decentralization: Failures of Tiebout Competition
46 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2011 Last revised: 20 Feb 2022
Date Written: July 2011
Abstract
We examine the welfare effects of provision of local public goods in an empirically relevant setting using a multi-community model with mobile and heterogeneous households, and with flexible housing supplies. We characterize the first-best allocation and show efficiency can be implemented with decentralization using head taxes. We calibrate the model and compare welfare in property-tax equilibria, both decentralized and centralized, to the efficient allocation. Inefficiencies with decentralization and property taxation are large, dissipating most if not all the potential welfare gains that efficient decentralization could achieve. In property tax equilibrium centralization is frequently more efficient! An externality in community choice underlies the failure to achieve efficiency with decentralization and property taxes: Poorer households crowd richer communities and free ride by consuming relatively little housing thereby avoiding taxes.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Identification and Estimation of Hedonic Models
By Ivar Ekeland, James J. Heckman, ...
-
Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions
By Dennis Epple and Holger Sieg
-
Identification and Estimation of Hedonic Models
By Ivar Ekeland, James J. Heckman, ...
-
By C. Lanier Benkard and Patrick Bajari
-
By C. Lanier Benkard and Patrick Bajari
-
By C. Lanier Benkard and Patrick Bajari
-
A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods
By Patrick J. Bayer, Robert Mcmillan, ...
-
A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods
By Patrick J. Bayer, Fernando V. Ferreira, ...