Comparative Approaches to the Use of Legislative History in Statutory Interpretation

34 Pages Posted: 31 Aug 2011 Last revised: 2 Sep 2012

See all articles by Holger Fleischer

Holger Fleischer

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law

Date Written: August 31, 2011

Abstract

In many legal systems the significance to be attributed to legislative history in the context of statutory interpretation remains unsettled. The following article explores this matter with regard to German, UK and US law. It develops arguments based in legal theory, constitutional law, and law and economics and thus affords deeper insight into the current discussion on legal methods on both sides of the Atlantic. At the same time, the topic is used to promote the further development of comparative legal methodology.

Please visit the website of the American Journal of Comparative Law to obtain the printed version of this article.

Keywords: statutory interpretation, legislative history, comparative legal methodology, exclusionary rule, textualism, dynamic statutory interpretation, subjective theory, objective theory

Suggested Citation

Fleischer, Holger, Comparative Approaches to the Use of Legislative History in Statutory Interpretation (August 31, 2011). American Journal of Comparative Law (AJCL), Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 401-437, Spring 2012, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 11/11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1920184

Holger Fleischer (Contact Author)

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law ( email )

Mittelweg 187
Hamburg, 20148
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
502
Abstract Views
2,168
Rank
104,413
PlumX Metrics