Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States: Whose Interests are Served

Organization & Environment, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 505-526, December, 2006

22 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2011

See all articles by Toddi A. Steelman

Toddi A. Steelman

University of Saskatchewan

Jorge E. Rivera

George Washington University - School of Business

Date Written: September 20, 2011

Abstract

The appeal of voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) lies in their promise to mutually serve government, industry, and environmental interests because they can reduce administrative burdens, provide flexibility to decide how to implement environmental improvements, and work toward superior environmental performance. In practice, however, one interest may be served to the exclusion of others, and this is a charge that often has beenleveled at VEPs in the United States. If VEPs are used to serve some interests at the expense of others, they are likely to lose their value as alternative policy instruments. This article details a framework involving procedural, substantive, and practical tests to determine whether the common interest has been served. This assessment framework is applied to two different VEPs in the United States: the Forest Stewardship Council Certification and the Sustainable Slopes Program.

Keywords: voluntary environmental programs, common interest, alternative regulatory

Suggested Citation

Steelman, Toddi A. and Rivera, Jorge E., Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States: Whose Interests are Served (September 20, 2011). Organization & Environment, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 505-526, December, 2006 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1931001 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931001

Toddi A. Steelman (Contact Author)

University of Saskatchewan ( email )

School of Environment and Sustainability
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A7
Canada

Jorge E. Rivera

George Washington University - School of Business ( email )

Washington, DC 20052
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
653
Rank
603,647
PlumX Metrics