Notes on a Bicentennial Constitution: Part II, Antinomial Choices and the Role of the Supreme Court
20 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2011 Last revised: 30 Dec 2014
Date Written: 1987
Abstract
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this article lays bare the inconsistencies in the expected tasks of the Supreme Court. Where some roles of the Court have traditionally been treated as indivisible, examining those same roles separate from one another produces an incoherent view of the Court that is difficult to compromise.
Keywords: federalism, judicial review
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Van Alstyne, William W. and Van Alstyne, William W., Notes on a Bicentennial Constitution: Part II, Antinomial Choices and the Role of the Supreme Court (1987). Iowa Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 1281, 1987, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-144, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1931094
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.