Inventing Trade Remedies in Response to Climate Change

Southwestern Journal of International Law, Forthcoming

Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-38

12 Pages Posted: 3 Oct 2011

See all articles by Jeffery Atik

Jeffery Atik

Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Date Written: September 27, 2011

Abstract

The most likely source for international trade conflict in the next decade - and the greatest potential force for inducing structural change to the global trading system - is the continuing roll-out of climate change measures. Indeed, such conflict is likely even were a post-Kyoto global climate change regime to fail to develop. Trade conflict may be unavoidable in a world of uncoordinated and conflicting national responses to global climate change.

The international trade politics of GHG limits are complex. Both cap-and-trade and carbon tax approaches will increase the cost of production of energy-intensive goods. Some important categories of internationally traded goods, such as steel and cement, are particularly affected. The shock of cost escalation will drive local producers to scrutinize the cost of carbon paid by rivals producing in other countries. New cries of unfair trade will likely sound in the event that there are (as there likely will be) large disparities in the prices of carbon between different WTO members. Differentials in national carbon prices are artifacts of the GHG emissions caps implemented by various states. It is carbon price differentials which are at the heart of the international trade/climate change collision.

Assuming that some form of import restriction will be an inevitable accompaniment to domestic carbon emission limits, there is a range of tools available. Whatever the political appeal of border adjustments, their practical administration is daunting. Implementing border adjustments will likely involve high expense and considerable inaccuracy. Crude results will result in either ineffective discrimination or an unfair burden on trade. As such, a proposal for border adjustments may fall under its own weight. Occasional and exceptional measures - import restrictions as a trade remedy, modeled on anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, and safeguard actions - may be a better solution than widely and routinely applicable border tax adjustments.

Suggested Citation

Atik, Jeffery, Inventing Trade Remedies in Response to Climate Change (September 27, 2011). Southwestern Journal of International Law, Forthcoming, Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-38, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1934431

Jeffery Atik (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8369 (Phone)
213-380-3769 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
142
Abstract Views
2,308
Rank
371,637
PlumX Metrics