Replications of Forecasting Research

12 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2011

See all articles by Heiner Evanschitzky

Heiner Evanschitzky

University of Münster - Finance Center Muenster

J. Scott Armstrong

University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department

Date Written: March 27, 2009

Abstract

We examined the frequency of replications published in the two leading forecasting journals, the International Journal of Forecasting (IJF) and the Journal of Forecasting (JoF). Replications in the IJF and JoF comprised 9.4% of the empirical papers. This compares with various areas of management science ranging from 2.2% in the Journal of Marketing Research to 18.1% in the American Economic Review. We also found that 36.2% of replications in forecasting journals provided full support, 44.7% partial support, and 19.1% no support for initial study findings. Given the importance of replications, we recommend steps to encourage replications, such as requiring full-disclosure of methods and data for all published papers, and inviting researchers to replicate specified important papers.

Keywords: forecasting, management science, marketing

Suggested Citation

Evanschitzky, Heiner and Armstrong, J. Scott, Replications of Forecasting Research (March 27, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1941347 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941347

Heiner Evanschitzky

University of Münster - Finance Center Muenster ( email )

Universitatsstr. 14-16
Muenster, 48143
Germany

J. Scott Armstrong (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department ( email )

700 Jon M. Huntsman Hall
3730 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6340
United States
215-898-5087 (Phone)
215-898-2534 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/people/faculty/armstrong.cfm

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
744
PlumX Metrics