Will Mrs. Bond Topple Missouri v. Holland?

Cato Supreme Court Review, Vol. 185, 2011

Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 11-27

19 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2011

See all articles by John C. Eastman

John C. Eastman

Claremont Institute Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence

Date Written: September 15, 2011

Abstract

Carol Anne Bond assaulted her former best friend with some chemicals she took from her workplace when she discovered the former friend was carrying her husband's baby. She was prosecuted not by the local district attorney for the simple assault, but by the U.S. Attorney for violating the federal statute that implements the international treaty against the use of chemical weapons. Mrs. Bond claimed that the federal statute under which she was convicted was an unconstitutional overreach of federal power, intruding into areas of core state sovereignty. The Third Circuit held that Mrs. Bond did not even have standing to raise that constitutional challenge. The U.S. Surpreme Court unanimously reversed. This article explores both the Supreme Court's jurisdictional holding and the merits of Mrs. Bond's constitutional challenge that will now be considered on remand to the lower courts. Essentially, the issue is whether the federal government can expand its own constitutional powers by use of the Treaty Clause, and this Article argues that it cannot.

Keywords: Missouri v Holland, Reid v Covert, Bond v United States, Treaty Power, Commerce Clause, Enumerated Powers, Constitution

JEL Classification: H1, H10, H11, H7, H70, H77, K14, K4, K40

Suggested Citation

Eastman, John C., Will Mrs. Bond Topple Missouri v. Holland? (September 15, 2011). Cato Supreme Court Review, Vol. 185, 2011, Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 11-27, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1941434

John C. Eastman (Contact Author)

Claremont Institute Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence

1317 W. Foothill Blvd., Suite 120
Upland, CA 91786
United States
877-855-3330 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.claremont.org/center-for-constitutional-jurisprudence/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
899
Rank
516,629
PlumX Metrics