Limits to Arbitrage and the Skewness Risk Premium in Options Markets
57 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2011 Last revised: 23 Jan 2012
Date Written: January 20, 2012
Abstract
Option prices, particularly those of out-of-the-money equity index puts, are difficult to justify in a no-arbitrage framework. This paper shows how limits to arbitrage affect the relative pricing of out-of-the-money put vs. call options (option-implied skewness). Decomposing the price of skewness into ex-post realized skewness and a skewness risk premium in commodity futures options markets, I find that the skewness risk premium increases, but realized skewness remains unchanged, when i) arbitrageurs hold larger net long positions in options, and ii) long positions in the underlying asset are concentrated among fewer traders. In addition, the first effect is stronger when arbitrageurs are more financially constrained. Trading strategies designed to theoretically exploit these limits yield up to 2 percent per month after risk-adjustment. The results provide solid support for the existence of a limits to arbitrage effect on option prices as well as option returns.
Keywords: Commodity Futures, Option-implied Skewness, Limits to Arbitrage
JEL Classification: G13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Tactical and Strategic Value of Commodity Futures
By Claude B. Erb and Campbell R. Harvey
-
The Tactical and Strategic Value of Commodity Futures
By Claude B. Erb and Campbell R. Harvey
-
The Long-Run Behavior of Commodity Prices: Small Trends and Big Variability
-
The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns
By Gary B. Gorton, Fumio Hayashi, ...
-
The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns
By Gary B. Gorton, Fumio Hayashi, ...
-
Momentum Strategies in Commodity Futures Markets
By Joëlle Miffre and Georgios Rallis