Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same But Different?

Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, Vol. 2, pp. 186-194, 2011

9 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2011 Last revised: 7 May 2012

See all articles by Kai P. Purnhagen

Kai P. Purnhagen

University of Bayreuth; Erasmus University of Rotterdam - Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics

Jörg Binding

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: November 22, 2011

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a general overview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainly focusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequent chapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatory mechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation. Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organizations to supervise the market on their behalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look reveals tendencies of convergence between the two systems.

Keywords: Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection, online commodity trading, supervision, regulatory objects, regulatory mechanisms, market surveillance, industry’s self- and co-regulation, private consumer organisations, e-commerce, China, EU, consumer protection

JEL Classification: K 33, K12

Suggested Citation

Purnhagen, Kai Peter and Binding, Jörg, Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same But Different? (November 22, 2011). Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, Vol. 2, pp. 186-194, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1963174

Kai Peter Purnhagen (Contact Author)

University of Bayreuth ( email )

Universitatsstr 30
Bayreuth, D-95447
Germany

Erasmus University of Rotterdam - Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics ( email )

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50
PO box 1738
Rotterdam, 3000 DR
Netherlands

Jörg Binding

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
591
Abstract Views
2,549
Rank
85,156
PlumX Metrics