The False Dichotomy between Theory and Practice: Lessons from Comparative Law

RECHTSWISSENCHAFT ALS JURISTISCHE DOKTRIN, pp. 105-128, Claes Peterson, ed., Stockholm, 2011

28 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2011

See all articles by Jaakko Husa

Jaakko Husa

University of Helsinki - Faculty of Law

Date Written: August 1, 2011

Abstract

Allegedly, there is a conflict between theoretical and practical comparative law. This conflict can be easily detected in any larger standard work on comparative law and in practically all other texts that deal with the epistemology of comparative law. Comparative law, in particular academic comparative law, has a constant struggle with two challenges. On the one hand, it seeks to justify its very existence to doctrinal study of law and to legal practice (e.g. judicial function, law drafting). On the other hand, it wishes to distance itself from practical comparative law. The purpose of this paper is to challenge this dichotomy and to argue that comparative law may not necessarily be conceived only as black or white. This paper claims that this dichotomy between theory and practice is way too crude of an epistemological distinction to be of any value while dealing with the comparative study of law.

Keywords: comparative law, methodology, legal theory

Suggested Citation

Husa, Jaakko, The False Dichotomy between Theory and Practice: Lessons from Comparative Law (August 1, 2011). RECHTSWISSENCHAFT ALS JURISTISCHE DOKTRIN, pp. 105-128, Claes Peterson, ed., Stockholm, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1965530

Jaakko Husa (Contact Author)

University of Helsinki - Faculty of Law ( email )

Porthania 5th Floor
P.O. Box 4
Helsinki, FIN-0001 4
Finland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
277
Abstract Views
1,510
Rank
200,782
PlumX Metrics