Optimal Expectations and Limited Medical Testing: Evidence from Huntington Disease
53 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2011 Last revised: 4 Mar 2023
Date Written: December 2011
Abstract
We use novel data to study the decision to undergo genetic testing by individuals at risk for Huntington disease (HD), a hereditary neurological disorder that reduces healthy life expectancy to about age 50. Although genetic testing is perfectly predictive and carries little financial or time cost, less than 10 percent of at-risk individuals are tested prior to the onset of symptoms. Testing rates are higher for individuals with higher ex ante risk of carrying the genetic expansion for HD. Untested individuals express optimistic beliefs about their probability of having HD and make fertility, savings, labor supply, and other decisions as if they do not have HD, even though individuals with confirmed HD behave quite differently. We show that these facts are qualitatively consistent with a model of optimal expectations (Brunnermeier and Parker, 2005) and can be reconciled quantitatively in this model with reasonable parameter values. This model nests the neoclassical framework and, we argue, provides strong evidence rejecting the assumptions of that framework. Finally, we briefly develop policy implications.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Andrew Caplin and John V. Leahy
-
I'll See it When I Believe it ? A Simple Model of Cognitive Consistency
By Leeat Yariv
-
Believe and Let Believe: Axiomatic Foundations for Belief Dependent Utility Functionals
By Leeat Yariv
-
The 'Ostrich Effect': Selective Attention to Information About Investments
By Niklas Karlsson, Duane J. Seppi, ...