The Constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the Courts of Appeals

15 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2011

See all articles by Mel Cousins

Mel Cousins

Trinity College (Dublin) - School of Social Work and Social Policy

Date Written: December 12, 2011

Abstract

Having undergone an extensive process of political discussion and debate, the ACA (properly the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) is now under intensive legal challenge with over 20 different cases from both states and organizations and individuals having been initiated. The challengers argue that the Act lacks a constitutional basis and/or infringes on their constitutional rights. These cases involve a fascinating intersection of legal, political and policy issues and, regardless of the outcome, will have important implications for the future direction of US health care policy. There have now been four decisions of the courts of appeal on the substantive issues involved with the courts involved coming to different conclusions as to the constitutionality of the legislation (Thomas More Law Ctr. v. Obama, 651 F.3d 529, (6th Cir. 2011); Florida v. U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 648 F.3d 1235, (11th Cir. 2011); Liberty Univ., Inc. v. Geithner, No. 10-2347, (4th Cir. Sept. 8, 2011) and Seven Sky v Holder, No 11-5047, (DC Cir. Nov 8, 2011)). This article discusses the issues involved, in particular whether the individual mandate is constitutional under the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and analyzes how the courts of appeal have addressed this issue in the cases to date. It considers how the case may be addressed by the US Supreme Court.

Suggested Citation

Cousins, Mel, The Constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the Courts of Appeals (December 12, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1971185 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1971185

Mel Cousins (Contact Author)

Trinity College (Dublin) - School of Social Work and Social Policy ( email )

Dublin
Ireland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
362
PlumX Metrics