Institutional Trader Monitoring and Firm Performance
38 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2011
Date Written: November 24, 2010
Abstract
Although recent research show that institutional informed trading can spur CEOs to work harder and reduce agency costs even for firms with dispersed ownership structure, it leaves unaddressed the ultimate impact of informed trading on firm value. This paper provides empirical evidence and finds that firm value indeed increases in institutional trader monitoring. In particular, the results confirm that the positive effect of institutional trader monitoring on firm value outweighs the negative effect of potentially increasing agency costs due to the reduced use of equity-based compensation to CEOs, revealed by Chen and Swan (2010). The results are robust to various measures of performance (stock returns, Tobin’s Q, and ROA) as well as to different specifications dealing with the issue of endogeneity.
Keywords: Wall Street Rule, Institutional investor monitoring, Firm performance, Corporate governance
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Corporate Governance and Shareholder Initiatives: Empirical Evidence
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, Paul H. Malatesta, ...
-
The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings
-
Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States
-
Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?
By Kai Li, Jarrad Harford, ...
-
Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance
-
By Tim C. Opler and Jonathan S. Sokobin
-
The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States
By Stuart Gillan and Laura T. Starks