Drafting Egypt’s Constitution: Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition?

Brookings-Stanford Project on Arab Transitions, No. 1

21 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2012 Last revised: 25 Aug 2013

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2026954:النسخة العربية من هذه الورقة

As the fundamental document establishing a framework for governance, the new Egyptian constitution will have a lasting effect on Egyptian law, politics, and society for years to come. However, Egypt’s transition is shaping up to be a case study in how not to initiate a constitution-writing process. If Egypt is to emerge with a stable constitutional order that protects basic rights, it will be in spite of the mismanaged transition dictated by the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). This paper examines the most important issues and actors in Egypt’s constitution drafting process, with a special focus on how procedural deficits may result in substantive shortcomings in the new constitution itself. The paper draws attention to the gulf between “best practices” in constitutional design and the political realities of the Egyptian transition. Policy recommendations are presented in light of these realities.

Keywords: Constitution, Constitutional Design, Egypt, Middle East, Political Transition, Democratization

Suggested Citation

Moustafa, Tamir, Drafting Egypt’s Constitution: Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition? (2012). Brookings-Stanford Project on Arab Transitions, No. 1, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2007085 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007085

Tamir Moustafa (Contact Author)

Simon Fraser University (SFU) ( email )

Simon Fraser University
7200-515 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 5K3
Canada

HOME PAGE: http://www.sfu.ca/internationalstudies/moustafa.html

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
128
Abstract Views
708
Rank
403,161
PlumX Metrics