Employment Retaliation and the Accident of Text

59 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2012 Last revised: 19 Apr 2012

See all articles by Alex B. Long

Alex B. Long

University of Tennessee College of Law

Date Written: February 23, 2012

Abstract

This Article explores the current and future landscape of employment retaliation law following the Supreme Court’s decisions in Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP and Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. As the law currently exists, statutory retaliation plaintiffs win or lose largely due to the accident of statutory text rather than the fact that the law is operating as Congress envisioned or as part of a coherent scheme of regulation. In short, the federal approach to workplace retaliation is inefficient, unnecessarily complex, and in need of major reform. Contrary to popular thinking, the article concludes that the text of many anti-retaliation provisions, coupled with the Court’s strongly textualist approach to interpretation, will leave courts with little choice but to adopt narrow constructions of other anti-retaliation provisions in the future.

Keywords: Retaliation, Discrimination, Kasten, Crawford

JEL Classification: J30, J50, J70, K10, K13, K31

Suggested Citation

Long, Alex B., Employment Retaliation and the Accident of Text (February 23, 2012). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 90, p. 525, 2011, University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 184, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2010084 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2010084

Alex B. Long (Contact Author)

University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )

1505 West Cumberland Ave.
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
1,357
Rank
506,051
PlumX Metrics