A Tax on Output of the Polluting Industry is Not a Tax on Pollution: the Importance of Hitting the Target
45 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2000 Last revised: 3 Nov 2022
Date Written: July 1999
Abstract
We explore the effects of environmental taxes that imprecisely target pollution. A review of actual policies indicates few (if any) examples of a true tax on pollution. More typically, environmental taxes target an input or output that is correlated with pollution. We construct a simple analytical general equilibrium model to calculate the optimum tax rate on the input of the polluting industry, in terms of key behavioral parameters, and we compare this imprecisely-targeted tax to an ideal tax on pollution. Finally, we consider incremental tax reforms such as a change in either tax from some pre-existing level. Using a utility-based money-metric measure of welfare, we examine the losses that arise from not taxing pollution directly. With no existing tax, under our plausible parameters, the welfare gain from an output tax is less that half the gain from an emissions tax.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Ian W. H. Parry, Roberton C. Williams, ...
-
By Ian W. H. Parry, Roberton C. Williams, ...
-
Environmental Controls, Scarcity Rents, and Pre-Existing Distortions
By Don Fullerton and Gilbert E. Metcalf
-
Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of Other Taxes:General Equilibrium Analyses
-
Environmental Tax Interactions When Pollution Affects Health or Productivity
-
By Carolyn Fischer and Alan K. Fox
-
Empirical Estimates for Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting
-
Empirical Estimates for Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting
-
The Two-Part Instrument in a Second-Best World
By Don Fullerton and Ann Wolverton
-
Revisiting the Cost of Protectionism: The Role of Tax Distortions in the Labor Market