Decentralized Deterrence, with an Application to Labor Tax Auditing
72 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2012
Date Written: March 2012
Abstract
Deterrence of illegal activities is frequently carried out by many atomistic auditors (tax auditors, law enforcement agents, etc.). Not much is known either normatively about the best way to incentivize atomistic auditors, nor positively about what these incentives actually look like in real world organizations. This paper focuses almost exclusively on the positive question. It proposes a game-theoretic model of decentralized deterrence and an empirical test, based on the equilibrium of the model, to identify the incentives of individual auditors. In the special (but important) case of tax enforcement, the paper fully characterizes the equilibrium of a strategic auditing game and provides a method to calibrate its parameters based on audit data.
Applying the model and method to Italian auditing data provides proof of concept: the methods are practical and tractable. We are able to provide an estimate of tax evasion based on (non-random) audit data alone. Counterfactual simulation of the model quantifies the costs and benefits of alternative auditing policies. We compare decentralized enforcement with a counterfactual commitment policy, and compute the loss from the former. Thus we are able to quantify the costs of decentralizing enforcement.
Keywords: audits, deterrence, tax evasion
JEL Classification: H26, H83, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of The1986 Tax Reform Act
-
Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration
By Joel B. Slemrod and Shlomo Yitzhaki
-
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications
By Jonathan Gruber and Emmanuel Saez
-
What Happens When You Tax the Rich? Evidence from Executive Compensation
-
A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion
By Raj Chetty
-
Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960-2000: Evidence and Policy Implications
-
Are "Real" Responses to Taxes Simply Income Shifting between Corporate and Personal Tax Bases?
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod