The Reality of EU-Conformity Review in France

54 Pages Posted: 11 Apr 2012 Last revised: 5 Feb 2013

See all articles by Juscelino F. Colares

Juscelino F. Colares

Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Date Written: May 3, 2012

Abstract

French High Courts have embraced review of national legislation for conformity with EU law in different stages and following distinct approaches to EU law supremacy. This article tests whether adherence to different views on EU law supremacy has resulted in different levels of EU directive enforcement by the French High Courts. After introducing the complex French systems of statutory, treaty and constitutional review, this study explains how EU-conformity review emerged among these systems and provides an empirical analysis refuting the anecdotal view that different EU supremacy theories produce substantial differences in conformity adjudication outcomes. These Courts' uniformly high rates of EU directive enforcement and similar willingness to refer questions to the ECJ for preliminary rulings demonstrate that, despite adopting dissimilar approaches to the supremacy of Communitarian law, French judges have flourished as Communitarian law judges. The article concludes by presenting an explanation for this high degree of convergence: French judges, responding to growing European integration and enabled by a changing constitutional landscape, adjusted their views to ensure they would have a role in molding the integration of national and EU law.

Keywords: EU Law, Conformity Review, Choice of Law, Comparative Law, Judicial Review

JEL Classification: F53, K33, K41

Suggested Citation

Colares, Juscelino F., The Reality of EU-Conformity Review in France (May 3, 2012). 18 Columbia Journal of European Law 369 (2012) , Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2038452

Juscelino F. Colares (Contact Author)

Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )

11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
108
Abstract Views
1,078
Rank
453,810
PlumX Metrics