Can International Election Monitoring Harm Governance?

Journal of Politics, Forthcoming

34 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2012 Last revised: 20 Jul 2014

See all articles by Alberto Simpser

Alberto Simpser

ITAM

Daniela Donno

University of Pittsburgh - Department of Political Science

Date Written: October 20, 2011

Abstract

The monitoring of elections by international groups has become widespread. But can it have unintended negative consequences for governance? We argue that high-quality election monitoring, by preventing certain forms of manipulation such as stuffing ballot boxes, can unwittingly induce incumbents to resort to tactics of election manipulation that are more damaging to domestic institutions, governance and freedoms. These tactics include rigging courts and administrative bodies, and repressing the media. We use an original panel dataset of 144 countries in 1990-2007 to test our argument. We find that, on average, high-quality election monitoring has a measurably negative effect on the rule of law, administrative performance and media freedom. We employ various strategies to guard against endogeneity, including instrumenting for election monitoring.

Keywords: Elections, International Election Monitoring, Electoral Manipulation, Governance

JEL Classification: D72, D73

Suggested Citation

Simpser, Alberto and Donno, Daniela, Can International Election Monitoring Harm Governance? (October 20, 2011). Journal of Politics, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2047555 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2047555

Alberto Simpser (Contact Author)

ITAM ( email )

Rio Hondo 1
Mexico City, CDMX 01080
Mexico
+525556284000 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.albertosimpser.com

Daniela Donno

University of Pittsburgh - Department of Political Science ( email )

135 N Bellefield Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
128
Abstract Views
1,529
Rank
400,044
PlumX Metrics