The Several Meanings of 'Politics' in Judicial Politics Studies: Why 'Ideological Influence' is Not 'Partisanship'

24 Pages Posted: 11 May 2012

See all articles by Brian Z. Tamanaha

Brian Z. Tamanaha

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law

Date Written: May 11, 2012

Abstract

Talk about judicial politics is ubiquitous in the press and in academia today. Discussions of this topic, unfortunately, are often vague or inconsistent about the precise meaning of politics in judging. This essay, a contribution to an Emory symposium on politics and judging, explores several core meanings to help identify what is, and what is not, inappropriate about politics in the context of judging. The failure to mark these differences in meanings and their implications, I argue, distorts matters and has the potential to undermine our judicial system. To illustrate the danger, I discuss the strong parallels between statements by political scientists about the political nature of judging and the argument by a prominent political activist that, since judging is inherently political, conservative judges should aggressively strive to implement the conservative agenda in their legal decisions. I argue that the failure of political scientists to distinguish between “ideological influence” (which is unavoidable in certain contexts) and “partisanship” (which is avoidable) leads to overly broad and misleading statements about politics and judging.

Keywords: judicial politics, ideological influence, partisanship, judging, rule of law

Suggested Citation

Tamanaha, Brian Z., The Several Meanings of 'Politics' in Judicial Politics Studies: Why 'Ideological Influence' is Not 'Partisanship' (May 11, 2012). Emory Law Journal, Forthcoming, Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-05-02, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2056372

Brian Z. Tamanaha (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
275
Abstract Views
1,211
Rank
202,258
PlumX Metrics