Homo Economicus vs. Human Being: Outcomes of Irrationality

34 Pages Posted: 21 May 2012

See all articles by Shoko Yamane

Shoko Yamane

Osaka University

Hiroyasu Yoneda

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Yoshiro Tsutsui

Kyoto Bunkyo University

Date Written: May 16, 2012

Abstract

This paper investigates the individual outcomes of irrational thinking, including paranormality and non-scientific thinking. These modes of thinking are identified by factor analysis from a 2008 survey. Income and happiness are used as measures of performance. Empirical results reveal that non-scientific thinking lowers income, whereas paranormality does not affect it. While non-scientific thinking lowers happiness, paranormality raises it. Extending the model, we find that higher ability and self-control result in higher income and happiness. Selfishness raises income, but diminishes happiness. These results suggest that Homo economicus generally achieves higher individual performance, except that belief in paranormality raises happiness.

Keywords: paranormality, non-scientific thinking, irrationality, happiness, factor analysis, Homo economicus

JEL Classification: D3

Suggested Citation

Yamane, Shoko and Yoneda, Hiroyasu and Tsutsui, Yoshiro, Homo Economicus vs. Human Being: Outcomes of Irrationality (May 16, 2012). ISER Discussion Paper No. 844, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2063268 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2063268

Shoko Yamane

Osaka University ( email )

1-1 Yamadaoka
Suita
Osaka, 565-0871
Japan

Hiroyasu Yoneda

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Yoshiro Tsutsui (Contact Author)

Kyoto Bunkyo University ( email )

Senzoku-80 Makishimacho
Uji, Kyoto 611-0041
Japan

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
635
Rank
506,544
PlumX Metrics