The Damage is Done: Ordering a New Trial Based Only on Damages

18 Pages Posted: 23 May 2012

See all articles by Katherine Kubale

Katherine Kubale

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Richard A. Bales

Ohio Northern University - Pettit College of Law

Date Written: May 22, 2012

Abstract

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the parties, on any or all of the issues, including damages. However, the federal circuits are split on how to handle new trials based solely on damages. One croup of circuits grants partial new trials on damages alone only if the erroneous damage amount did not in any way affect the determination of any other issue. Under this standard, a new trial on damages is allowed when the second jury can evaluate the first damage award without also re-examining other issues, such as liability. Another group of courts, however, permits a new trial on damages even where the issue of damages is interwoven with other issues, and allows both parties to present evidence and testimony from the first trial if the re-presented evidence or testimony is related to damages in some way. This article argues that courts should follow the latter approach because it prevents injustice to one or both parties by making it easier to obtain a new trial based solely on damages, and it allows both parties to present evidence necessary to their arguments.

Keywords: damages, trial

Suggested Citation

Kubale, Katherine and Bales, Richard A., The Damage is Done: Ordering a New Trial Based Only on Damages (May 22, 2012). Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 40, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2064836

Katherine Kubale

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Richard A. Bales (Contact Author)

Ohio Northern University - Pettit College of Law ( email )

525 South Main Street
Ada, OH 45810
United States
419-772-2205 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.onu.edu/node/3073

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
213
Abstract Views
1,476
Rank
261,422
PlumX Metrics