Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) The O'Brien Defence - a Compromise Reworked?
10 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2012
Date Written: 2002
Abstract
This commentary explores the recent decision of the House of Lords in Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) and considers its impact on the ability of a surety to set aside a loan transaction on the basis of undue influence or misrepresentation on the part of the principal debtor.
Keywords: child law, family law, loan transaction, undue influence, misrepresentation, principal debtor
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Haley, Michael, Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) The O'Brien Defence - a Compromise Reworked? (2002). Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 93-102, 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2089429
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.