Hierarchical Consequentialism
Utilitas, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 309-330, 2010
22 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2012
Date Written: July 12, 2012
Abstract
The paper considers a hierarchical theory that combines concern for two values: individual well-being – as a fundamental, first-order value – and (distributive) fairness – as a high-order value that its exclusive function is to complete the value of individual well-being by resolving internal clashes within it that occur in interpersonal conflicts. The argument for this unique conception of high-order fairness is that fairness is morally significant in itself only regarding what matters – individual well-being – and when it matters – in interpersonal conflicts in which constitutive aspects of individual well-being clash. Consequently, the proposed theory is not exposed to claim that fairness comes at the expense of welfare. This theory is considered within a consequential framework, based on the standard version and, alternatively, on a novel interpretation of consequentialism. Thus, it refutes the claim that consequentialism does not take the distinction between persons seriously.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
On the Value of Distributional Equality
By Joseph Raz
-
By David Enoch and Andrei Marmor
-
By Mordechai Kremnitzer and Re'em Segev