A Reflection on Section 2(b)’s Quixotic Journey, 1982-2012

Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 58, Fall 2012

32 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2012 Last revised: 30 Oct 2013

See all articles by Jamie Cameron

Jamie Cameron

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

The point of departure for the journey ahead is the journey behind, from 1982 to 2012. This reflection describes s.2(b)’s journey in the first thirty years of the Charter as quixotic: principle led the way at times but too often and too easily was displaced by unsound methodologies. The expressive freedom jurisprudence developed an incoherent methodology that applied content neutrality under s.2(b) but readily upheld content-based limits under s.1 by deferring to perceptions – both legislative and judicial – that certain expressive activities are harmful. Meanwhile, the status of the press and media under s.2(b) remains unclear because the Court has been unwilling to constitutionalize the newsgathering function or acknowledge that interference with that function violates the Charter. By contrast, the Court’s response to open justice – which engages expressive and press interests – produced a methodology that gave strong protection to values of access, transparency, and accountability in the justice system. Having discussed the doctrinal patterns and anomalies of the first thirty years this reflection looks ahead – to offer a more holistic view of s.2(b) which highlights process values, and outline the steps that must be taken demonstrate that the Charter’s guarantees of expressive and press freedom truly matter.

Keywords: journey, s.2(b), charter, quixotic, jurisprudence, s.1, court, justice

JEL Classification: K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Cameron, Jamie, A Reflection on Section 2(b)’s Quixotic Journey, 1982-2012 (2012). Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 58, Fall 2012 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2121445

Jamie Cameron (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
117
Abstract Views
778
Rank
427,613
PlumX Metrics