Between Fragmented Authoritarianism and Policy Coordination: Creating a Chinese Market for Wind Energy

Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 7

Posted: 8 Aug 2012

See all articles by Adrian Lema

Adrian Lema

Denmark Ministry of Climate, Energy and Buildings

Date Written: July 1, 2007

Abstract

The Chinese grid-connected wind energy sector has undergone a number of fundamental changes during its 20 years of existence. The scope of this article is to track the reforms of the energy bureaucracy and its policy approach on the one hand and changes in wind energy installations on the other. By comparing three historically distinct phases of wind energy in China it is shown how policy reforms have changed largely from a state of “fragmented authoritarianism” towards policy coordination. In the initial phase (1986–1993), wind energy was expanding very slowly with disjointed policy making and in the incremental phase (1994–1999), the energy authorities were in dispute over the strategy and launched conflicting policy initiatives with poor results in wind energy output. The latest coordinated phase (2000–2006), however, developed a coherent renewable energy agenda and policy regime for the wind power sector. It is found that this phase with coordinated market regulations and incentives has helped give birth to a take-off in Chinese wind energy installations and substantial cost reductions, although the latter is threatening the profitability of wind farms. The article contributes to the academic debate over the role of policy making in renewable energy development and argues that China should continue, and improve, the coordination of regulations and incentives.

Keywords: Renewable energy policy, Wind power, China

Suggested Citation

Lema, Adrian, Between Fragmented Authoritarianism and Policy Coordination: Creating a Chinese Market for Wind Energy (July 1, 2007). Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 7, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2125947

Adrian Lema (Contact Author)

Denmark Ministry of Climate, Energy and Buildings ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
465
PlumX Metrics