Analyst Research and Investor Reactions: Evidence from the 2008 Financial Crisis

37 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2012 Last revised: 23 Nov 2012

See all articles by Daniel Arand

Daniel Arand

University of Giessen - Department of Financial Services

Alexander Gabriel Kerl

University of Giessen - Department of Financial Services

Date Written: November 23, 2012

Abstract

In this paper we explore how the 2008 financial crisis impacted sell-side analysts’ research as well as the market reactions to the publication of such research. Based on over 350,000 analyst reports from 2005 to 2010, we find that during the crisis analysts only disproportionately adapted their expectations, relative to the stock market development. Overall, they maintained a positive view towards corporate performance and stock returns. Consequently, analysts’ accuracy with respect to target prices and earnings forecasts significantly deteriorated during the sub-period October 2007 to March 2009, leaving their research output (ex-post) less reliable to investors. Strikingly though, investors’ responses to target price and earnings forecast revisions were significantly stronger and more persistent during than outside the crisis. We conclude that investors relied most on analysts when they should have done so least.

Keywords: Financial Crisis, Analyst Reports, Forecast Accuracy, Abnormal Returns

JEL Classification: G01, G14, G24

Suggested Citation

Arand, Daniel and Kerl, Alexander Gabriel, Analyst Research and Investor Reactions: Evidence from the 2008 Financial Crisis (November 23, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2126605 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2126605

Daniel Arand

University of Giessen - Department of Financial Services ( email )

Licher Str, 74
Giessen, 35394
Germany

Alexander Gabriel Kerl (Contact Author)

University of Giessen - Department of Financial Services ( email )

Licher Str, 74
Giessen, 35394
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,221
Abstract Views
5,215
Rank
31,601
PlumX Metrics