Software Predatory Pricing and Competition Law - Assessing Below-Cost Prices

European.Competition.Law.Review. 2012, 33( 9), 413-429

Posted: 13 Aug 2012 Last revised: 9 Apr 2014

See all articles by Qiang Yu

Qiang Yu

Leiden Law School; Skolkovo Institute for Law and Development, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Date Written: August 13, 2012

Abstract

Below-cost pricing may elicit lawyers to contemplate market power, market barriers and predatory pricing, all of which constitute routine thinking on abusive pricing. This paper observed that below-cost pricing occurs in the software market under traditional circumstances and found that, as is typical with a new economy, the software market exposes different factors that are not evident in the markets on which traditional predatory pricing theory was based. These factors, such as extremely high switch/entry barriers and negligible marginal costs, result in pricing practices that are significantly different from those in traditional markets. A below-cost price, which traditionally would be considered predatory, may be necessary in the software market. Thus, in this context, a below-cost price would not be considered abusive but would rather be considered (almost) efficient. On the basis of these observations, this paper concludes that predatory pricing frequently occurs in software markets and that PP in software markets should be regulated by competition rules. At the same time, although efficiency-enhanced below-cost pricing occurs often, it is different from predatory pricing. Finally, this paper analyses the occurrence of predatory pricing and offers an approach for analysing predatory pricing as it relates to the software market.

Keywords: software, predatory pricing, dominant position abuse, below-cost prices

JEL Classification: K21, L11, L86, O31

Suggested Citation

Yu, Qiang, Software Predatory Pricing and Competition Law - Assessing Below-Cost Prices (August 13, 2012). European.Competition.Law.Review. 2012, 33( 9), 413-429, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2128446

Qiang Yu (Contact Author)

Leiden Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

Skolkovo Institute for Law and Development, National Research University Higher School of Economics ( email )

136, Rodionova street
25/12, Bolshaya pecherskaya street
Nizhniy Novgorod, Moscow 603155
Russia
9152091681 (Phone)
9152091681 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,194
PlumX Metrics