Aviation, Carbon, and the Clean Air Act

Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 12-22

43 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2012

See all articles by Nathan D. Richardson

Nathan D. Richardson

University of South Carolina - Joseph F. Rice School of Law; Resources for the Future

Date Written: July 24, 2012

Abstract

This paper explores the policy options available to the United States for regulating greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft under existing law: the Clean Air Act (CAA). Europe has unilaterally and controversially moved to include aviation emissions in its Emissions Trading System. The United States can, however, allow its airlines to escape this requirement by imposing “equivalent” regulation. U.S. aviation emissions rules could also have significant environmental benefits and would limit domestic emissions beyond the reach of the European Union. With new legislation unlikely, the CAA is the only plausible vehicle for such regulation. Title II Part B of the CAA does grant EPA broad regulatory authority over aviation emissions, though this authority has not been used aggressively. EPA could impose meaningful aviation GHG limits and, by using performance standards, give airlines incentives to creatively comply. It might further be possible to allow some forms of emissions trading, though the law is unclear. Emissions by foreign airlines in the United States could be covered under the act, though international law might impose barriers.

Keywords: Clean Air Act, aviation, aircraft, carbon, emissions, GHGs, European Union, trading, flexibility

Suggested Citation

Richardson, Nathan D., Aviation, Carbon, and the Clean Air Act (July 24, 2012). Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 12-22, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2129370 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129370

Nathan D. Richardson (Contact Author)

University of South Carolina - Joseph F. Rice School of Law ( email )

1525 Senate Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States

Resources for the Future ( email )

1616 P Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
636
Rank
559,703
PlumX Metrics