Zero Inflation and the Friedman Rule: A Welfare Comparison
FRB Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 83, No. 4, Fall 1997, pp. 1-21
21 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2012
Date Written: 1997
Abstract
According to standard monetary theory, optimal monetary policy involves slight deflation. Central banks, however, advocate zero inflation. Is there a significant welfare difference between zero inflation and optimal deflation? The answer hinges on the behavior of money demand at low nominal interest rates. Estimates of a general money demand function imply that there is not a significant difference: zero inflation yields roughly 90 percent of the total benefits to be gained by moving from 5 percent inflation to optimal deflation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: An Empirical Assessment
By Ben S. Bernanke, Vincent R. Reinhart, ...
-
The Zero Bound in an Open Economy: A Foolproof Way of Escaping from a Liquidity Trap
-
Theoretical Analysis Regarding a Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates
-
Real Implications of the Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates
-
By Jess Benhabib, Stephanie Schmitt-grohé, ...
-
By Jess Benhabib, Stephanie Schmitt-grohé, ...
-
Escaping from a Liquidity Trap and Deflation: The Foolproof Way and Others
-
Monetary Policy When the Nominal Short-Term Interest Rate is Zero
By James A. Clouse, Dale W. Henderson, ...