Pooling or Purchase: A Merger Mystery
20 Pages Posted: 26 Nov 2012
Date Written: 1999
Abstract
Public merger announcements often state which type of merger accounting, pooling or purchase, has been employed. The choice can strongly influence accounting results. For example, reported earnings are often higher under pooling than purchase accounting. Yet empirical analysis indicates that the higher earnings reports do not fool investors. Why then do acquisitive managers display a preference for pooling, especially considering its high cost? Here is a mystery to be solved. U.S. accounting standards may soon be changed to eliminate pooling as an option. Still, any change should be approached cautiously since there is reason to suspect that real managerial benefits underlie the pooling preference.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Purchase Versus Pooling in Stock-for-Stock Acquisitions: Why Do Firms Care
By David Aboody, Ron Kasznik, ...
-
Evidence on the Use of Unverifiable Estimates in Required Goodwill Impairment
By Karthik Ramanna and Ross L. Watts
-
Leading Indicators of Goodwill Impairment
By Carla Hayn and Patricia J. Hughes
-
Causes and Consequences of Goodwill Impairment Losses
By Zining Li, Pervin K. Shroff, ...
-
Evidence on the Effects of Unverifiable Fair-Value Accounting
By Karthik Ramanna and Ross L. Watts
-
Goodwill Valuation Effects of the Initial Adoption of SFAS 142
By Changling Chen, Mark J. Kohlbeck, ...
-
The Information Content of Goodwill Impairments and the Adoption of SFAS 142
By Daniel A. Bens, Wendy Heltzer, ...
-
Early Impressions of Australia's Brave New World of Goodwill Impairment
By Tyrone M. Carlin and Nigel Finch
-
Goodwill Impairment Testing Under IFRS - A False Impossible Shore?
By Tyrone M. Carlin and Nigel Finch