Are Founding Families Special Blockholders? - An Investigation of Controlling Shareholder Influence on Firm Performance

SES Working Paper No. 428

42 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2012 Last revised: 25 Apr 2014

See all articles by Dušan Isakov

Dušan Isakov

University of Fribourg (Switzerland) - Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences

Jean-Philippe Weisskopf

EHL Hospitality Business School

Date Written: October 3, 2013

Abstract

This paper examines how family and non-family ownership affects the performance of Swiss listed firms from 2003 to 2010. We distinguish between these two types of controlling shareholders since they have different objectives. We hypothesise that only family shareholders have a real incentive to reduce agency costs whereas non-family blockholders are similar to widely held companies. Our results show that family firms are more profitable than companies that are widely held or have a non-family blockholder. We investigate the impact of different features of family firms on performance, and document that the level of family ownership, the generation of the family and the active involvement of the family play an important role for market valuation.

Keywords: founding family firm, active management, founder, ownership structure, firm performance, contestability

JEL Classification: G3; G32

Suggested Citation

Isakov, Dušan and Weisskopf, Jean-Philippe, Are Founding Families Special Blockholders? - An Investigation of Controlling Shareholder Influence on Firm Performance (October 3, 2013). SES Working Paper No. 428, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2134805 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2134805

Dušan Isakov (Contact Author)

University of Fribourg (Switzerland) - Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences ( email )

Fribourg, CH 1700
Switzerland

HOME PAGE: http://www3.unifr.ch/cgf/en/

Jean-Philippe Weisskopf

EHL Hospitality Business School ( email )

Route de Cojonnex 18
Lausanne, 1000
Switzerland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
384
Abstract Views
2,337
Rank
142,706
PlumX Metrics