Fixed Amount Saving and the Permanent Income Hypothesis

44 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2012

See all articles by Simeon Vosen

Simeon Vosen

Rhine-Westphalia Institute for Economic Research (RWI-Essen)

Date Written: August 1, 2012

Abstract

According to the German SAVE survey, more than 40 percent of households regularly save fixed amounts rather than flexibly adjusting savings to income variations as assumed by the Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH). Fixed amount saving behaviour could thus imply a challenge to PIH-based standard models of consumption if it meant that a substantial share of households would consume rather than save transitory income. A deeper examination of the SAVE-data suggests that the PIH could still be compatible with fixed amount saving behaviour since (a) the transitory income component of fixed amount savers’ tends to be relatively low and (b) one-off receipts of income likely to be transitory increase the probability of fixed amount savers to alter their saving behaviour and save the residual. Analysis of aggregate data, however, indicates that fixed amount saving nevertheless leads to a rejection of the PIH, accounting for at least some of the excess sensitivity of consumption to predictable income changes observed in Germany.

Keywords: Fixed Amounts Saving, Permanent Income Hypothesis, Consumption, Excess Sensitivity

JEL Classification: D11, D12, E21

Suggested Citation

Vosen, Simeon, Fixed Amount Saving and the Permanent Income Hypothesis (August 1, 2012). Ruhr Economic Paper No. 363, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2144782 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2144782

Simeon Vosen (Contact Author)

Rhine-Westphalia Institute for Economic Research (RWI-Essen) ( email )

Hohenzollernstr. 1-3
Essen, 45128
Germany
0049 201 8149 263 (Phone)
0049 201 8149 300 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
735
Rank
669,747
PlumX Metrics