A Comparative Study of the Volatility and Efficiency of Commodity Futures Index Roll Methods

19 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2012 Last revised: 25 Jan 2013

See all articles by Rajarshi Aroskar

Rajarshi Aroskar

University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

Bill Ogden

University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

Date Written: September 12, 2012

Abstract

We compare the volatility and efficiency of roll methods of 5 index providers across 15 individual commodity indexes to naïve rolling (rolling from nearest futures contract on its expiration date to the second nearest – “continuous futures series”). For all series and all providers, the difference in means between each index and its respective continuous futures series is not statistically significant. All indexes are consistently less volatile than their respective continuous futures series. In general, we find that roll methods are less volatile and more efficient than the continuous futures series. Implications for investors and index providers are discussed.

Keywords: roll methods, commodity indexes

Suggested Citation

Aroskar, Rajarshi and Ogden, Bill, A Comparative Study of the Volatility and Efficiency of Commodity Futures Index Roll Methods (September 12, 2012). Midwest Finance Association 2013 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2145487 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2145487

Rajarshi Aroskar (Contact Author)

University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire ( email )

Accounting and Finance

Bill Ogden

University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire ( email )

Accounting and Finance
105 Garfield Avenue
Eau Claire, WI 54702-4004
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
918
Rank
442,582
PlumX Metrics