Nationalization, Expropriation or Confiscation: A Critical Overview of the Pro and Contra Arguments Regarding the Effect of the Land Use Act on Land in Nigeria

17 Pages Posted: 23 Oct 2012

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: September 30, 2012

Abstract

This paper examines the pro and contra arguments regarding the effect of the Nigerian Land Use Act on land. The paper argues that the terms ‘nationalization’, ‘expropriation’ and ‘confiscation’ inappropriately describes the effect of the Land Use Act on land in Nigeria. What is certain is that the Act only transfers the allodial title from the former allodial owners to the governor, leaving intact all lesser rights. However, the governor does not hold the land beneficially, but holds it in trust for the benefit of all Nigerians.

Keywords: Nationalization, Expropriation, Confiscation, Land, Law, Act

Suggested Citation

Duru, Onyekachi, Nationalization, Expropriation or Confiscation: A Critical Overview of the Pro and Contra Arguments Regarding the Effect of the Land Use Act on Land in Nigeria (September 30, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2154678 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2154678

Onyekachi Duru (Contact Author)

LEGAL EMPERORS ( email )

13A AKPAN AKPA ETUK STREET
UYO, AK
Nigeria
+234-8022148248 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.legalemperors.com.ng

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
479
Abstract Views
2,830
Rank
81,448
PlumX Metrics